“I hate polemical politics and polemical divinity,” a politician once said. “My religion is founded on the love of God and my neighbor; on the hope of pardon for my offenses; upon contrition . . . in the duty of doing no wrong, but all the good I can, to the creation of which I am but an infinitesimal part.”
This country was founded with the principle of freedom of religion: that is, to believe in any religion one chooses, or none. This doesn't mean that we cannot practice our chosen religion, but that the government may not choose one for us. We may not agree with the religion or practice another chooses to follow, or we may be distressed that they have not the comfort of any, but the principle itself is gravely important. Our government and our people have struggled long with the implementation of this principle, especially as the population of the country has become more diverse. Some people feel that this country started off Christian and ought to remain Christian. Well, frankly, further back than the white Christians were the Native Americans--and we won't even go into treating on THAT topic. Not all of the "founding fathers" were...umm...mainline Christians, either (would that have been why some of the original settlers came here in the first place?) And I wonder if in ridding the United States of the threat of diverse religions and cultures, folks would be pleased to rid their lives as well of all the inventions, advances, food (!) and other richness this plurality of cultures has brought to our country. Here is the definition of bigotry: "stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own." http://dictionary.reference.com/
It is not a new thing that religious followers of varying types say and do things in the name of God that are horrific and damaging. Lately, I have been struck by the ever more appalling, ridiculous and detestable things that are being said during this Presidential campaign. I read an op ed in the Akron Beacon Journal yesterday about why politicians use negative ads ( http://www.ohio.com/editorial/drew-westen-why-do-campaigns-use-attack-ads-they-work-1.266989 )--but I can still wish the system could function with the common sense and decent humanity that God and our forebears (I believe) would hope for us to exhibit.
Two pieces about negative yak:
With rhetoric like this, these Christian conservatives are playing an ancient game. They are using religion to separate the world into “us” and “them.” They are saying, “The president is not like us.”
...Religion has done much good in the world, but it becomes dangerous when the “us and them” worldview grows rigid — when “we” claim moral (or theological) superiority over others. No one should know this better than Santorum, for Roman Catholics have been among the most persecuted groups in America. Yet for Santorum, history has had no modulating effect. The “phony” remark seems, at worst, calculated to remind voters of Wright and the “liberation theology” he preached, and in so doing to incite racism and fear.
...America was founded by people who hoped that by allowing religious diversity to flourish, they might discourage extremism from growing. Counter to the claims of so many Christian conservatives, the intent of the First Amendment is not to protect any particular brand of Christianity from government encroachments, but to allow all kinds of believers to practice freely.
“I hate polemical politics and polemical divinity,” a politician once said. “My religion is founded on the love of God and my neighbor; on the hope of pardon for my offenses; upon contrition . . . in the duty of doing no wrong, but all the good I can, to the creation of which I am but an infinitesimal part.”
It is only unfortunate that these sentiments were those of John Adams — and that they are two centuries old."
and
http://www.davidmixner.com/2012/02/santorums-god-america-and-the-lgbt-community.html#more